Gobseck by Balzac

“I like to leave mud on a rich man’s carpet; it is not petty spite; I like to make them feel a touch of the claws of necessity.”

The lawyer Derville is one of the most fascinating characters I’ve met in Balzac’s Comédie Humaine, and so I was delighted to find him again in the story Gobseck. It’s the winter of 1829-1830, and the action takes place in the salon of the Vicomtesse de Grandlieu. The evening’s entertainment is over, and most of the guests have left–with the exception of the Vicomtesse’s brother and an old trusted friend of the family who turns out to be Derville. The Vicomtesse takes the opportunity to lecture her 17-year-old daughter Camille about her improper behaviour towards the Comte de Restaud. Apparently the Comte carries considerable baggage–namely his mother:

A mother who wasted millions of francs; a woman of no birth, a Mlle Goriot; people talked a great deal about her at one time. She behaved so badly to her own father, that she certainly does not deserve to have so good a son.

Ok, so the objections to the Comte are largely his mother, and the Vicomtesse adds:

So long as his mother lives, any family would take alarm at the idea of intrusting a daughter’s fortune and future to young Restaud.

I’ve read Old Goriot, so I knew just what the Vicomtesse was talking about, and at this point Derville, who finishes his hand of cards, interjects with a story from his youth. And what an incredible story this is–one that shows Balzac’s amazing powers of perception, and here he’s at his supreme best as he dissects the nature of greed and various other human vices. The story (which racks in at about 154 pages) gives us a dash of Derville’s early career, a man who according to Balzac “had not an attorney’s soul.” Derville is a successful man who’s trusted by some of France’s most prominent families, but he’s not driven by ambition–there’s some nebulous design to his actions. Can it be that he’s interested in gaining some sort of justice for those wronged in a world in which the unjust, corrupt and greedy prosper so well? Does Derville’s intelligence demand at least some sort of fascination for those he represents? Both of these elements–fascination and a sense of justice–seem to be in play when he represents Colonel Chabert.

Derville takes his story back in time to when he was a 25-year-old student lodging in a dreadful boarding house in the Rue de Gres. One of Derville’s fellow lodgers is Gobseck–a notorious money lender:

His age was a problem; it was hard to say whether he’d grown old before his time, or whether by economy of youth he had saved enough to last him his life.

His room and everything in it, from the green baize of the bureau to the strip of the carpet by the bed, was as clean and threadbare as the chilly sanctuary of some elderly spinster who spends her days rubbing her furniture. In winter time, the live brands of the fire smouldered all day in his grate. He went through his day, from his uprising to the evening coughing-fit, with the regularity of a pendulum, and in some sort was a clockwork man, wound up by a night’s slumber. Touch a wood-louse on an excursion across your sheet of paper, and this creature shams death; and in something the same way my acquaintance would stop short in the middle of a sentence, while a cart went by, to save the strain to his voice. …

His life flowed soundless  as the sands of an hour-glass. His victims sometimes flew into a rage and made a great deal of noise, followed by a great silence; so is it in a kitchen after a fowl’s neck has been wrung.

A miserable and appropriate image indeed. Derville is clearly fascinated by Gobseck, and over the years, an unlikely relationship slowly develops between the two men, and strangely this relationship grants Derville an education in the deviousness of human nature. Here’s Gobseck to the young Derville:

You have all sorts of beliefs, while I have no beliefs at all. Keep your illusions–if you can. Now I will show you life with the discount taken off. Go wherever you like, or stay at home by the fireside with your wife, there always comes a time when you settle down in a certain groove, the groove is your preference; and then happiness consists in the exercise of your faculties by applying them to realities.

According to Gobseck there is only “one concrete reality” in the world, and yes, it’s GOLD which he says “represents every form of human power.” Living next to Gobseck over the course of several years, Derville sees many people from all walks of life fall into the moneylender’s dreadful and pitiless power. There are some people who seek money from Gobseck to assuage the vices of others, but there are also members of the ‘finest’ families in France who come to Gobseck’s door as a result of a range of secret behaviours. Derville sees it all, and amasses experience through witnessing the constant, unceasing caravan of the desperate who seek money from the hands of Gobseck–the moneylender of last resort.

One of the things that amuses Gobseck the most is the massive, constant upkeep of the wealthy. Here’s Gobseck arriving at the home of a certain Countess de Restaud to collect his money:

A painter would have paid money to stay a while to see that scene that I saw. Under the luxurious hanging draperies, the pillow crushed into the depths of an eider-down quilt, its lace border standing out in contrast against the background of blue silk, bore a vague impress that kindled the imagination. A pair of satin slippers gleamed from the great bear-skin rug spread by the carved mahogany lions at the bed-foot, where she had flung them off in her weariness after the ball. A crumpled gown hung over a chair, the sleeves touching the floor;  stockings which a breath would have blown away were twisted about the leg of an easy-chair; while ribbon garters straggled over a settee. A fan of price, half unfolded, glittered on the chimney piece. Drawers stood open; flowers, diamonds, gloves, a bouquet, a girdle were littered about. The room was full of vague sweet perfume. And–beneath all the luxury and disorder, beauty and incongruity, I saw Misery crouching in wait for her or for her adorer, Misery rearing its head, for the Countess had begun to feel the edge of those fangs. Her tired face was an epitome of the room strewn with relics of past festivals. The scattered gewgaws, pitiable this morning when gathered together and coherent, had turned heads the night before.

So the signs of vice are slowly demolishing the beauty of the young Countess, and Derville goes on to tell the tale of just how he becomes involved with Gobseck and his business dealings with the Restauds. Gobseck predicts the worst for the Comte and the Comtesse de Restaud, and Derville sees Gobseck’s worst predictions come true.

Anyway, an incredibly powerful novella–one that immediately shoots to my favourite Balzac list. Not only does Gobseck give us another glimpse of the intelligent and fascinatingly elusive Derville, but here we also see just how Gobseck–one of literature’s greatest creations operates and exists parasitically on the vices of others. Yet we should remember that Gobseck only feeds the vices that already exist–he doesn’t own a gambling house, he doesn’t encourage spending or the keeping of mistresses (or gigolos), he just feeds the vices of others until those vices consume those who indulge weaknesses.

Pay the price of your luxury, pay for your name, pay for your ease, pay for the monopoly which you enjoy! The rich have invented judges and courts of law to secure their goods, and the guillotine–that candle in which so many lie in silk, under silken coverlets, there is remorse, and grinding of teeth beneath a smile, and those fantastical lions’ jaws are gaping to set their fangs in your heart.

Translated by Ellen Marriage

(The photo depicts Fabrice Luchini as Derville in the film Colonel Chabert)

About these ads

17 Comments

Filed under Balzac, Fiction

17 responses to “Gobseck by Balzac

  1. I have the idea that you’re filtering the good Balzacs from the others for me with your reading Balzac Project.
    I’m putting this one on my list immediately.

    Indeed, if the Comtesse de Restaud’s maiden name is Mlle Goriot, one can be frightened to have her as a mother-in-law. Just as a girl should be afraid to have Undine Spragg as a mother-in-law. In my mind the Goriot daughters and Undine Spragg are carved in the same wood.

    This business of getting fresh money at any cost is also described in La Cousine Bette. It intrigues me, I’d like to read a non-fiction book about it but I don’t know where to find one. Are there many details about the transactions in Gobseck (interest rates, legal info…) ?

    • Nothing so noble Emma: I’m reading them (or trying to read them) chronologically, and while Gobseck actually was published before The Ball at Sceaux, I initially thought Gobseck came afterwards. Then when I went back and checked the publication chronology, I found the error.
      The novella goes into some small detail of Derville’s legal career and how he launched lawsuits to claim some monies lost during the revolution. There’s also some detail when Gobseck explains to Derville some of his business practices (bills of exchange, discounts, interest rates). Derville actually borrows money from Gobseck in order to purchase the law practice at which he works.

      • I meant that, since you’re reading them all (and in chronological order), I just have to follow your blog and read your reviews to know the ones I should read too. I know the obvious ones but I don’t think I would have chosen Gobseck or Le Bal à Sceaux.

        So there are financial details, interesting for me. I’m going to read it. (when is another question)

  2. Another one I have not read yet but I think I’ve got it. I only hope my memory of Le père Goriot and others isn’t too blurred to get into this one.

    • Caroline: my memory of Old Goriot isn’t that detailed either and I’ll be rereading it before long, but the main thing is that if you remember how he was treated by his daughters, then you get the picture.

  3. Fabulous! How did I miss this one? Thanks for the pointer!

  4. “Gobseck” is so useful for understanding a certain subplot of Père Goriot. It should be published with Père Goriot as an appendix. And as Guy says, it has its own virtues.

  5. Okay, minor question: Derville helps the old count with his idea for a fictitious transfer of property; she suspects something, and on the count’s death, ransacks the room, finds the document, and burns it, thinking it disinherits her and her children. Derville shouts, “You have ruined your children!” because what she has burned is the counter-deed that nullified the fictitious one. Gobseck is delighted – he owns the property of the dead count outright now! But when Gobseck dies, Derville states he will ensure that the Count’s son is provided for.

    Did I miss something here? This is simply because Derville is that rara avis, an honest lawyer, no? And Gobseck trusted him to be that way since he didn’t really want to dispossess innocent children? Or, was Derville outwitting his mentor? Not clear to me.

    The scene of the Count’s death and immediate aftermath are priceless, to use an apt metaphor!

  6. “Help him!” cried Gobseck. “Not I. Adversity is the greatest of all teachers; adversity teaches us to know the value of money and the worth of men and women. let him set sail on the seas of Paris; when he is a qualified pilot, we will give him a ship to steer.”
    “I left him without seeking to explain the meaning of his words.”

    later Derville says he returns to Gobseck and “pressed him to carry out his contract.”

    IMO I think Derville and Gobseck honoured the contract they had with the Comte de Restaud.

    Have you read Colonel Chabert?

    • Okay, that’s pretty much my reading.
      Chabert, no. Now I think I’ll see if it’s available on my wife’s kindle, or do you not recommend that old translation?

      • Chabert the book isn’t one of the great ones. I have the New Directions version trans. by Carol Cosman, but as you know it’s also as another version on the kindle (free). I haven’t compared the two versions, but it’s not a major work (although since it features Derville, it’s a must-read). It’s still wonderful but it has a more sketchy feel to it. Derville takes on the case of Colonel Chabert, and how he does this addresses the whys, I think, about his character. You get to see how he lives and his habits. Plus the book has some great quotes. Catch the film version if you can. One of my top films.

        • Turns out that I read Gobseck some five or six years ago. It didn’t impress me then: that was before my heavy Balzac immersion.
          I got Chabert on Kindle and I’ll look for the film.
          Do you post about every book you read?

  7. No I don’t write up books I dislike or are mediocre (not worth the time) and I skip a few if the backlog is too long.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s