Can You Forgive Her? by Anthony Trollope

“He talked non-stop about my beauty, as all men do. If a woman were hump-backed, and had only one eye, they wouldn’t be ashamed to tell her she was a Venus.”

I have a backlog of reviews–something I’m never that happy about–but this does grant room for choice, and I decided to make a Trollope review my first post of the year. Can You Forgive Her?, the first of six Palliser novels, stands at 830 pages in my Penguin Classics edition (a different edition from the one pictured below). I read just a few pages at night, and what a delightful read this is. It’s not often you go to sleep chuckling at the foibles of human nature, and this is one of those novels I was sad to see end.

Can You Forgive Her? was originally published in monthly parts, so in typical Victorian multi-plot fashion, this is a huge rambling tale with a vast cast of characters and various sub-plots set against a glittering society of 19th century England. This is a complex world and Trollope hints that the world of marriage and the world of politics have a great deal in common.  To some readers, that description alone is enough to reject the book, but for this reader, Can You Forgive Her? was a leisurely excursion into the trials and tribulations of three women–specifically on the issue of marriage. These are the days in which wealthy women, when married, were stuck with the behaviour of their husbands. Marriage was a serious, permanent choice, and women were under tremendous pressure to make ‘suitable’ alliances. This issue is at the core of Trollope’s novel, and through the labyrinth plot, we see the struggles of three women as they make–or live with–the choices they make. These women live in an age of not exactly ‘arranged’ marriages, but let us say it’s the age of ‘organised’ marriage–and this is, as Trollope shows us, rather a fine line.

The novel’s main heroine is 24-year-old Alice Vavasour, and she’s the one–as the title suggests–is in need of forgiveness. It’s true that Alice makes some horrible mistakes in the course of the story, and the underlying explanation of her actions isn’t entirely successful, but more of that later.  When the story begins, Alice, the only child of a London bureaucrat is engaged to be married to John Grey–a handsome, good-natured gentleman of substance. Grey adores Alice, but for her part Alice has reservations. She keeps delaying the wedding day and while her relatives approve of Mr. Grey–who’s literally a paragon, there’s an edge of discontent nagging away inside Alice. She knows that she loves Mr. Grey but can’t quite see herself  living as Mrs. Grey bundled off to his country estate near Cambridge. Trollope tells us that part of Alice’s problem is that she would like to be married to a ‘great man,’–perhaps someone in politics, and this isn’t Mr. Grey’s bag.

Another problem Alice must deal with is that she’s been engaged before to her cousin, the wastrel George Vavasour, the brother of her best friend, Kate. We don’t know quite what went wrong but we can speculate that it was something scandalous enough for her to brook family criticism when she broke this first engagement. According to the elderly Lady Macleod, “the fact was, Alice, that George Vavasour’s mode of life was such that an engagement with him would have been absolute madness.”

When the book begins, we can believe that George’s largest fault lies in the fact he has no money, but as the plot plays out, George’s more unsavoury characteristics are revealed, and in any other continent or class we’d call him an adventurer, but in the upper echelons of British society, George’s true nature is largely concealed, and this is due in so small part to the fact that he actively compartmentalises his true nature.

But back to the plot. The book begins with Alice engaged to Mr. Grey and beginning various delaying tactics to postpone the wedding. One of those tactics is to take a European holiday with Kate and George, and several of Alice’s relatives are alarmed by this action due to Alice’s prior history with George. Alice’s travels seal her decision to jilt Mr. Grey, and Alice calls off her engagement to Mr. Grey claiming that she finds him too perfect, and then she becomes re-engaged to George. A mess ensues with Alice not really being able to make her mind up while her relatives, with the exception of Kate, becoming extremely frustrated with her ever-changing choice of fiancés.

Ok so that’s more-or-less the plot, but obviously there’s a lot more to the book than that. Two other plots run parallel to Alice’s dilemma, and the characters involved serve to enervate her argument against marrying Mr. Grey. While Alice shies away from marriage to Mr. Grey (even though she says she loves him), she argues that she wants a public life. At one point in the novel, she goes to stay with Lady Glencora Palliser at Matching Priory, and while this should be an opportunity for Alice to enjoy politically important company, instead she is intimidated by the heavily-nuanced society in which she feels uncomfortable.

Lady Glencora, one of the greatest heiresses in the country, once loved her cousin, the impoverished Burgo Fitzgerald, and she was steered away from Burgo and into the arms of the eminently respectable, but overly staid Plantagenet Palliser–a promising young politician and the heir of the Duke of Omnium. Alice goes to visit Lady Glencora, and there’s some history here as Alice refused to participate in secret assignations between Glencora and Burgo before her marriage to Palliser. Lady Glencora invites Alice to visit her, and while the primary idea is that Lady Glencora will set Alice straight by example, instead Glencora confesses that she is still madly in love with Burgo and bored and unhappy with Palliser. Alice becomes a bystander to Glencora’s unhappiness:

If he [Palliser] was dull as a statesman he was more dull in private life, and it may be imagined that such a woman as his wife would find some difficulty in making his society the source of her happiness. Their marriage, in a point of view regarding business, had been a complete success, –and a success, too, when on the other side, that of Lady Glencora, there had been terrible dangers of shipwreck, and when on his side also there had been some little fears of a mishap. As regards her it has been told how near she went to throwing herself, with all her vast wealth, into the arms of a young man, whom no father, no guardian could have regarded as a well-chosen husband for any girl; –one who as yet had shown no good qualities, who had been a spendthrift, unprincipled, and debauched. Alas, she had loved him! It is possible that her love and her wealth might have turned him from evil to good. But who would have ventured to risk her, –and I will not say her and her vast inheritance, –on such a chance? That evil, however, had been prevented, and those about her had managed to marry her to a young man, very steady by nature, with worldly prospects as brilliant as her own, and with a station than which the world offers nothing higher.

But while disaster seems to have been averted by Glencora’s marriage to Palliser, this is not a formula for Glencora’s happiness. She’s bored and extremely unhappy. Her situation isn’t helped by the fact that she’s monitored by two of Palliser’s toadies, and she’s under constant surveillance by the sanctimonious Mrs Marsham, and the loathsome Mr. Bott. Trollope shows us that the upper echelons of British society protects its assets but with little provision for personal happiness.

The third subplot concerns Alice and Kate’s widowed Aunt Greenow (Arabella Vavasour)– a woman whose state of wealthy widowhood allows her more freedom than any other female in the novel. As an old maid, she was a burden to her relatives who dismissed her as an “old flirt,” when suddenly and unexpectedly she landed a wealthy, elderly husband in ill health. After Arabella became Mrs. Greenow, her currency increased measurably within the family. Now she’s a widow, and unfettered by matrimony and fueled with money, Aunt Greenow is out to enjoy life, and she does so with gusto–taking Kate along for the ride. It’s through this character that Trollope’s humour shines. At Yarmouth, Aunt Greenow is pursued by no less than two suitors–the impecunious Captain Bellfield and Mr Cheesacre–a gentleman farmer of Oileymead who’s known as Cheesy. Both Bellfield and Cheesy desperately court Aunt Greenow while she plays fast and loose, claiming mourning (and an ever-shifting time period since the death of her dear Mr. Greenow) as an excuse against making a commitment. Bellfield and Cheesacre–rivals in adversity–are driven to extreme lengths in their amorous siege of the stubborn widow. They are rather like dogs fighting for possession of a bone, and at one point, Cheesacre decides to invite Bellfield to the country thinking this will allow unfettered access to the widow Greenow:

Driven to despair, he at last resolved to ask Bellfield to come to Oileymead for a month. That drilling at Norwich, or the part of it which was supposed to be profitable, was wearing itself out. Funds were low with the Captain, –as he did not scruple to tell his friend Cheesacre, and he accepted the invitation. “I’ll mount you with the harriers, old fellow,” Cheesacre had said, “and give you a little shooting. Only I won’t have you go out when I’m not with you.” Bellfield agreed. Each of them understood the nature of the bargain; though Bellfield, I think, had somewhat the clearer understanding in the matter. He would not be so near the widow as he had been at Norwich, but he would not be less near than his kind host. And his host would no doubt watch him closely;– but then he also could watch his host. There was a railway station not two miles from Oileymead and the journey thence into Norwich was one of half an hour. Mr Cheesacre would doubtless be very jealous of such journeys, but with all his jealousy he could not prevent them. And then, in regard to this arrangement, Mr Cheesacre paid the piper, whereas Captain Bellfield paid nothing. Would it not be sweet to him if he could carry off his friend’s prize from under the very eaves of his friend’s house?

So Trollope shows us penniless men: Burgo Fitzgerald, George Vavasour, and Captain Bellfield and unleashes them on the women who have the means to provide for the lifestyles they crave. But even while I put these three men in the same bag, they are different and perhaps they don’t deserve to be lumped together. Burgo and Bellfield are good-natured men; Burgo has been brought up into life of privilege without the means to sustain this abundance, and poor Captain Bellfield lives off the meagre pocket money given to him by his sister. Of course there’s a great irony here as the women with money (with the exception of Arabella Greenow) are subjected to tremendous social pressure to conform–look at the tremendous wealth of Glencora, for example, who still couldn’t do as she pleased. Lest I give the wrong impression, I should add that some of the women in the tale come off as badly as the men–Lady Monk leaps to mind. She’s a woman who “had succeeded in marrying her daughter to the greatest fool in the peerage.” And what of Alice–I’d argue that Alice’s root problem is fear of sex and not all those other excuses she dreams up.

About these ads

18 Comments

Filed under Fiction, Trollope, Anthony

18 responses to “Can You Forgive Her? by Anthony Trollope

  1. I was looking forward to reading this review since Daniel Pool (You know, the “What Jane Austen Ate and Charles Dickens Knew” book I’ve been reading) makes frequent references to this novel. Actually, you’d think that Can You Forgive Her? and The Eustace Diamonds are the only Trollopes he’s read.

    That sounds just great but huge. The Pallisser novels are the ones with a character named Plantagenet, aren’t they? Why does he have such a royal and medieval first name?

    Btw, I’m just at the beginning of Miss Mackenzie but the description of women’s lives, lack of freedom and pressure to conform is there too. I really enjoy the light ironic tone Trollope uses to describes events and her decision-making process. I’m glad that he created a female character who seems — so far — neither vapid nor stupid.

    • I don’t know why Trollope picked that name for Palliser, but I don’t expect it was an accident. To me it implies that Palliser is the sort of man who’s the backbone of the country, and of course he’s the result of decades of breeding and is considered very reliable. This is the first of the 6 Palliser novels so I’m really looking forward to getting into them.

  2. PS: Strangely, Trollope’s novels are being translated into French for the first time. Most of them haven’t been translated yet and for the ones that have, the translations date back to the 1990s for the oldest ones. Miss Mackenzie was translated into French in 2010.
    I’m glad I can read them in English but I’m surprised that he wasn’t translated before.

  3. Yes, Alice probably is a little wary of the physical side of a relationship (I’m sure many a paper has been written on this), which is strange when you think she initially opts for the more physical of her suitors…

    Of course, it’s Plantagenet Palliser and Lady Glencora who are really important here, and we will see more and more of them as the series progresses (with the exception of ‘The Eustace Diamonds’, in which Palliser barely appears). The development of Palliser’s character over these six novels, and the Barchester one he first appears in, is probably Trollope’s finest achievement.

    Emma, ‘Miss Mackenzie’ is one I haven’t read yet, and it’s not one I’ve heard much about! That’s what happens when you write over fifty novels ;) I’m still working my way through the more well-known works (e.g. the twenty or so published in OWC editions.)

    • Tony: Remember that scene when George wants a kiss from Alice? The poor girl ends up throwing her money at him in her attempts to keep him away.

      Have you seen the television series version of the novels?

      I picked Miss Mackenzie for Emma in our virtual gift exchange as I thought she’d love it and it would be the perfect intro to T.

      • I’ll have to give it a try, but not any time soon – as well as having the final three Palliser novels to reread, I’ve actually won five more Trollope novels in a Twitter competition :)

        And yes, I remember the scene very well – a very animalistic sort of approach… Sadly, I haven’t scene any of the adaptations; I’ll have to watch out for something on the ABC.

        • Lucky you! I bought most of mine years ago and it’s a good thing as so many titles are OOP. I’ve liked all the adaptations I’ve seen (The Way We Live Now, Barchester Towers, He Knew He Was Right), and I have the old Pallisers set on my shelf but haven’t got to it yet.

    • I’m only reading Miss Mackenzie because Guy gave it to me for our Christmas exchange. I’d never heard of it before but according to the comments he got on his Christmas post, it’s a good book. So far I think they’re right.

  4. Maybe I should start with the one you gave Emma. I shy away from such long novels but I like the sound of this one.
    I’m surprised he wasn’t translated into French and I was decidedly not aware of the fact that he wrote 50 novels as Tony says.

    • I’ve read quite a few of the lesser Trollope (literally= less pages) and firguratively = not his great novels), and I think Miss Mackenzie is a great place to start. It’s a meaty novel but not a huge multi-plot and it’s very engagingly well done.

  5. I enjoyed the Barchester books but haven’t yet venture into the Pallisers – they are so LONG – not a problem in itself but I have so many others to read.

    It was a very different world then wasn’t it. Its hard to get my head round what a marriage would have been like in those days. We have a wholly different set of complexities these days – but perhaps equally as difficult to navigate.

    • Marriages are easier to shed these days but equally turbulent. I read somewhere that the very poor and the very rich are more likely to stay together (unless they’re film stars) whereas it’s the middle class more likely to bail. In this novel, I liked the way Trollope showed Glencora as a prisoner of her wealth. Aunt Greenow is the woman with the most freedom in the novel and that’s because she’s paid her dues.

  6. I have The Warden as my first Trollope to try, my fear with the others is as Tom mentions, they are so very long.

    The Barchester books also beckon.

    Still, it sounds very rewarding and a lovely match for your readings of Zola and Balzac of course. Plus this gave rise to an excellent Pet Shop Boys’ song (at risk of lowering the tone there).

  7. Like Tom, I have read the Barchester series but not yet started the Palliser one. We have watched the DVDs and found them excellent — Trollope’s style (influenced, I am sure, by serial publication) makes him a natural for good video because there are a lot of side stories to be quickly developed and executed.
    I would also say from my Barchester experience that he is a writer of long books (in terms of page count) who reads short (in the sense that there is a lot of pace and no trouble keeping going).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s