Anna Edes by Dezso Kosztolányi

A few months ago, I finished the marvellous novel Skylark by Dezso Kosztolányi, and so flush with that successful reading experience, I sought out a copy of Anna Edes. My version is published by New Directions and translated by George Szirtes. Szirtes also writes an introduction–much appreciated by this reader. I’d much rather read an intro by the translator than a celebrity ‘guest’ writer as the translators often seem to have a much better knowledge of the subject matter. Anna Edes was Kosztolányi’s last novel, published in 1926.

When the novel begins, it’s a crucial time in Hungarian history. It’s 1919 and the government has changed hands numerous times since the conclusion of WWI. First the collapse of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy after the Aster or Chrysanthemum Revolution of 1918 led by Count Károlyi. By March 1919, Károlyi resigned and communist/Bolshevik Béla Kun subsequently ran the Hungarian Soviet Republic until its collapse in August 1919. This is where Anna Edes begins with the sentence  “Béla Kun was fleeing the country in an aeroplane,”  and there’s the added delicious detail that he fled with his pockets “stuffed with sweet pastry.”

Anna Edes is a portrayal of bourgeois life seen mainly through the pitiful treatment of a wretched servant by Mr and Mrs Vizy. When the novel begins Hungary’s social order is shaken to its foundations. It’s the end of the Bolshevik rule and while some people rue this, others anticipate the return of the old social order.  The headline in the communist newspaper warns: “The Proletariat in Danger!” But to the Vizys–an unpleasant couple entrenched in the emptiness of their own pathetic social status, the collapse of Béla Kun’s government is a cause of celebration. Vizy, a minor political official who tried to keep his head low during the purges of the  Béla Kun government, gloats at the departure of the Bolsheviks. The last few months have been difficult. At one point, Mrs Vizy was arrested:

She had been shaking out a tablecloth at the window and they charged her with secretly signalling to counter-revolutionary forces. They had dragged her off to parliament and only allowed her home at midnight, by which time she had been broken body and spirit. The next morning, a young functionary called, who produced a cane from his leather leggings, and proceeded, while insolently strutting about, to requisition two of their rooms, the dining room in which they presently sat and the adjoining drawing room. It was lucky that the system had collapsed before any lodgers had been foisted on them.

Vizy “ruined by the war,” diminished by the communist government, a witness of its bloody excesses, and fearful of the Lenin Lads is euphoric at the defeat of the Bolsheviks, yet still trembles and fumbles for his trade-union card when there’s a knock at the door:

He went quite pale. He stared at the air before him, as if searching for the word he had just uttered, so he might wipe away all trace of it. He waved his hand vaguely, trying to clear some imperceptible fug of smoke.

“I’ll answer it.” He strode with sudden decision into the hall, steeled for the worst. They might be looking for hostages, it might be a house search or state of emergency! He mentally prepared his defence: twenty years in public service, a social conscience, a general sympathy with Marxism though he deplored its excesses.

For the purposes of the novel, the bourgeois representatives of society are the Vizys, their friends and acquaintances–other couples who live in a three-storey house in Budapest. The Vizys live in four rooms on the first floor, and the floor above is divided into two flats, occupied by the Drumas (a solicitor and his wife) and Dr and Mrs Moviszter. The building’s caretaker, who lives in the basement flat, is Ficsor (who considers himself “Red aristocracy“), a man who neglected his work during the Bolshevik period, but who shuffles back to his duties when Béla Kun’s government fails.

In one of the funniest scenes of the book, Ficsor and Vizy confront one another unsure just how the other should be addressed. Should Ficsor be addressed as “Comrade”? Should Vizy be addressed as “your excellency”? These salutary fetishes, which are emblematic of the shifting social order, are crucial. Not only does everyone have to be addressed correctly, but using the proper salutation indicates compliance and submission to the shifting social order–whatever that may be.

 The Vizys, the Drumas, and the  Moviszters are not rich by any stretch of the imagination, but they all have a servant. During the brief Bolshevik period, the servants grew  ‘uppity’ and difficult to manage. As Hungary kisses the Bolshies goodbye, the novel implies that  the traditional roles of master-servant are reverting back to what they once were. During the rule of Béla Kun, Mrs Vizy’s current servant, Katica, grew particularly difficult. The Vizy apartment is untidy, and Katica, who has assignations with a sailor lover, disappears for long periods of time. 

Katica was still with them but only just. She did more or less as she pleased now and they didn’t even ask her to tidy the flat. Mrs Vizy took a perverse joy in watching the dust and dirt gather.

Unhappy with the excesses and laziness of Katica, the Vizys acquire a new maid, Anne Edes, the niece of Ficsor. Anna is a treasure, but the Vizys never acknowledge that. They take pride in giving her even less wages than Katica, and once wooed away from another employer, she’s treated quite badly. She works from four in the morning until late at night, and she sleeps on a makeshift bed in the kitchen. In return for her room and board, the Vizys have a veritable slave. In their eyes she is reduced to a machine–a machine that works harder and requires less maintenance than their previous servants.

The bourgeois women in the novel are obsessed with their servants. During social evenings, the wives compare the excesses and merits of their servants–rather as one might compare other social markers or fetish objects (I’m reminded of a conversation I recently heard in which people compared ‘water features’). Over time it becomes apparent that Mrs Vizy will never be content with any servant, and “it was always the present incumbent she hated most, whose presence it was which most increased the sum of her misery.” In this inherently unhealthy situation, Mrs Vizy finds meaning in her unhappy existence through the productivity of her servant. Kosztolanyi’s tale seems to say that the labour of another perverts the nature of the one who oversees it.

Mrs Vizy views her troubled history with servants as a matter of “luck,” and yet underneath that word lurks an underlying sense of personal failure. She sees Anna’s work ethic as a reflection on her ability to control and influence another–therefore ‘good’ hard-working servants are, to Mrs Vizy, a reflection of the character of their employers. This idea is apparent in social evenings with the bourgeoise women discussing the merits of their respective servants, and the fact that servants are some sort of sub-human species. Mrs Vizy concludes to her friends that Anna has the perfect life:

“Certainly she works hard enough. But what does she want?’ she asked with some annoyance. “She gets food, she gets lodgings. She even gets clothes. She can bank her earnings. What else could she desire in these difficult times? What problems has she? She doesn’t have to maintain this large flat, she doesn’t have to bother her head with what to cook, or how to find the money, she can live without a thought, without a care in the world. I often think that nowadays it is only servants who can live really well.”

The women sighed as though they had all chosen the wrong career, and now regretted that harsh circumstances prevented them from becoming servants.

Skylark possessed a certain joyousness. Perhaps that was mainly due to the bitter-sweet freedom of all the excesses of restaurant meals enjoyed by its characters. While Anna Edes is powerful it’s also a much bleaker tale. This is an exploration of the exploitation of a fairly uninteresting servant girl, pimped out to a form of slavery by her uncle who needs to curry favour with the gentry. Anna’s flat, lifeless qualities (seen from her employers’ perspective) and her willingness to absorb all the demands of her unreasonable employers made for a  less interesting tale. Anna has a spark for a while, but to delve into that too much would spoil the tale. I much preferred Skylark, so it’s probably a good thing that I read it first. Anna Edes illustrates the inherently unhealthy aspect of the master-slave relationship, and its chilling aspects recall the true story of the Papin sisters. After all, a beaten dog will often turn on its so-called master.



Filed under Fiction, Kosztolányi Dezso

25 responses to “Anna Edes by Dezso Kosztolányi

  1. Great review, really enjoyed it. Put it on my to-read list.

  2. You, Tom and others, are tempting me to read more European writers – but where to find the time?

    This sounds as though it has some lovely irony in it – love that last quote with the women sighing “as if they had chosen the wrong career”! Makes me wonder how often we are self-deluded as we go about justifying our actions!

  3. Interesting book, made more interesting by this review. Would love to read more European novels once I’ve gone over most of the better Filipino novels I’d still have to read. 🙂

  4. I really like the last quote. Pure meanness and selfishness as Balzac or Chabrol can show it.
    Gary says that racism is when people don’t matter. You can make anything you want to them because what they think of you doesn’t matter. They’re second zone humanbeings.
    In this case, it is class racism.

    Max and you make my “books to read” pile increase dangerously.

  5. Karlo: yes, Anna Edes is, I think your sort of book. I preferred Skylark, I have to say.

    Gummie: I looked at my bookshelf the other day and noticed that three books–all side-by-side (and unread) were by Australian authors, so while I am busy reading European authors, I am neglecting other parts of the globe.

    BATC: I hadn’t thought of Balzac/Chabrol, but yes there is a mean streak here. The translator said that the author’s anger showed through. I’m not familiar enough with his work to say, but it’s certainly much darker than Skylark.

  6. I’ve met some of these unconsciously mean and stupid persons. To paraphrase Jane Austen, meanness “working on a weak head, produces every sort of mischief.”

    • BATC: The author doesn’t appear to be completely unsympathetic to Mrs Vizy, at least in the beginning of the novel. Her husband is a chronic adulterer and their only child died. As the story plays out, it’s clear that Mrs Vizy’s life is empty. The only thing she can focus on are the 4 rooms they live in, and that extends to the management of their overworked servant.

  7. I love books like this which present such an authentic snapshot of other times and cultures. This is one author I must read before long – you have convinced me.

  8. How did you find the translation Guy?

    I quite agree on the forewords by the way. I occasionally read celebrity forewords where it’s apparent they don’t know much about the novel or even don’t like it that much.

    It doesn’t sound like another Skylark as you say, but it does sound good. That last quote too, the other day I was talking to someone who I know earns somewhere in the region of £1.5-2 million a year and they were complaining of the difficulties it caused them. How it made it harder to retire because you got used to the money.

    I appreciate that may be an issue, but I suspect in the grand scheme of human experience it’s not really up there as one of the more serious ones.

    Many times I’ve heard people with servants (au pairs, nannies, maids) talk of how they’re “almost part of the family”. No, they’re not. As long as you can fire them they’re not part of your family. Saying they almost are is just a way of patting yourself on the back for being a nice employer.

    Anyway, another one I must track down. Is it still in print do you know?

    • I thought the translation was good. It wasn’t clunky and it wasn’t overally modern either.
      I could swear that it was OOP when I bought my copy (which is used and has all sorts of writing in the margins: “Irony!” “Most important chapter in book!” etc), but when I went back to double-check, there it is in print. My copy is from New Directions and I believe that they tend to re-release (reprint) their titles from time to time. Since it’s the same translator as before (my oop older copy and the one you can now buy), I’m guessing a re-release.

      I read somewhere that many publishers report increased sales in the back issues which is, supposedly, unusual. At least that was the gist of the article. Perhaps the title was revived by the Skylark release?

      The ‘almost family’ comment makes me laugh. Some time ago I watched a film in which the lady of the house was swept up in some romance and she was confiding in her maid. Both were giggly. Then the maid muttered some sort of caution, and her employer came back with the ‘how dare you comment’. The relationship swiftly slid away from two young giggly girls to its former status, and that moment showed how toxic the relationship was. Well anytime you have to pay someone to be nice to you and to do what you say, there’s always a problem.

      Funny comment about how hard it is to retire when you are used to a couple of mill a year. Reminds me of Alfred Doolitle’s reluctance to have a substantial amount of money as he knows it brings its own set of woes (and bills).

  9. leroyhunter

    I’d love to know how that conversation you mention panned out, Max…what do you do when confronted with that kind of attitude? Nod, smile, say nothing? Agree? Tell them to get a bleeding grip?

  10. In the context a nod and a smile were what was required.

    As problems go, one would think too much money would be among the more easily solved. There are so many willing to help with it after all.

    There’s a P Diddy (or P, or Puff, or whatever he is presently) video where he wins a golf tournament and a huge prize and someone says to him “mo’ money, mo’ problems”, which he repeats back to himself. It’s a phrase some hip-hop artists use, I think intending to suggest their lives aren’t all cognac and cigars. It doesn’t persuade. If more money were that big an issue there’s plenty of people would be only too happy to help out.

    Then again, P Diddy isn’t one of the more thoughtful hip-hop artists. I’ve never heard the smarter guys in that crowd use the phrase.

    Who the aristocracy is changes. It’s desire to see itself as the norm, to see its problems as more pressing than the other guy’s, that doesn’t.

  11. The article dedicated to Anna Edes (translated as Anna la douce) on the Francophone Wikipedia is interesting.

    I hope the link works.

  12. Thanks BATC. That link didn’t work but I searched within the site and found the article via the author. Thanks again.

  13. angela1221

    I think Kosztolányi’s poems is also very nice. If you can speak in Hungarian, you can read them here:

  14. CZak

    I think Mrs Vizy is a pathetic soul – moreso than Anna . . . Her only sense of control in life is to control her servants . . . She has no control over her husband or the political circumstances in Hungary at the time . . . She is in complete denial about the changing social climate, and all she has left is to obsess about Anna . . . She feels if she can take credit for Anna, then she will have accomplished something meaningful . . . Anna is her muse. The pessimism of the Hungarian spirit truly seeps from each character . . . You have to be Hungarian to understand this (as I am) . . . it’s in the blood.

  15. Kamilla

    Kosztolanyi is one of my favourite writers. I wish there were better translations of his work. Maybe there are, but I haven’t seen them yet. Of course it is best to read him in the original Hungarian…same with Attila Jozsef, Ady etc.

  16. I have a third novel (English translation) waiting to be read. I don’t read Hungarian, so I can’t really comment on how authentic the translations are, but the two I’ve read so far flowed very nicely. No complaints.

  17. Pingback: One by one the lights were going on in the worn chandeliers of middle-class life. | Pechorin’s Journal

  18. Pingback: Book Club: new selection | Book Around The Corner

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.