The Santa Klaus Murder: Mavis Doriel Hay (1936)

Mavis Doriel Hay’s The Santa Klaus Murder is a traditional country house murder mystery–so that means a limited number of suspects, but in the case of this novel there are multiple narrators as various characters give their versions of events.
It’s 1935, another Christmas gathering at Flaxmere, the country estate of the indomitable Sir Osmond Melbury–a man who rules his large family with an iron hand. Now aged and infirm after a stroke, Sir Melbury is no less formidable. He has five children–four daughters and a son along with various in-laws and grandchildren. Everyone descends on Flaxmere once again for the traditional Christmas holiday.

Sir Osmond’s sister, his former housekeeper, Aunt Mildred is convinced that no good can possibly result from confining the family members together under one roof, and she’s proved right when her brother is found dead in his study. In terms of the family fortunes, this is a delicate time, and everyone stands to benefit from the old man’s death in some way. His youngest daughter Jennifer wants to marry Philip Cheriton, the man she loves, while her father pushes and actually invites another suitor for Christmas, Oliver Witcombe. It’s a sign of Sir Osmond’s character that he invites Witcombe for Christmas as not only is this a blatant declaration of the fact he’s ignoring Jennifer’s feelings but it’s also an indication of how he thrives on tension and the awkward, “strained,” atmopshere. Jennifer, engaged now for several months,  plans to defy her father even though this would mean that she’d be cut from the will. Then there’s the eldest daughter, Hilda, who defied her father and married an artist for love years ago, and now she’s a widow, living in meagre circumstances, with a grown daughter who needs a university education. In contrast to Hilda, Edith, Sir Osmond’s second daughter, abandoned the man she loved in order to please her father by marrying Sir David Evershot. The couple have no children and this may be explained by the rumours of hereditary madness in Sir David’s family.

the santa klaus murderTo complicate matters, Sir Osmond has an eminently efficient and attractive secretary and housekeeper: Miss Grace Portisham. Several of Sir Osmond’s children are concerned that their father could change the will in his housekeeper’s favour. She has slowly and silently made changes at Flaxmere–changes some of the children, Edith, Eleanor, and George, “like birds of prey,” resent:

They found, too, that rooms had been done up in new color schemes and there were various innovations in household organization. Edith expressed her disapproval of the changes and hinted at a lack of good taste. Always Sir Osmond poo-poohed her criticism, boasted how economically everything had been done, and lauded Miss Portisham.

Edith and Eleanor and George became increasingly anxious about Grace Portisham. She was a schemer–and how far was she prepared to go? They would gladly have seized any opportunity to discredit her, but she was so discreet, so tactful, that she seemed invulnerable. Each Christmas they arrived in a greater state of anxiety unalloyed by the obvious facts that Miss Portisham greatly increased the comfort of life at Flaxmere and was never seen by anyone to presume above her station.

There’s a crisis looming at Flaxmere; Jennifer’s older siblings want her to remain there and keep an eye on Miss Portisham, nicknamed, “the portent,” but Jennifer plans to marry her fiancé and leave, financial consequences be damned. Will Miss Portisham ‘take over’ Flaxmere? Is it possible that Sir Osmond might consider marriage to Miss Portisham? Of course all of these concerns end, abruptly, when Sir Osmond is murdered.

Sir Osmond isn’t a particularly nice person, and there’s the sense that he squashes independent action in his children. Jennifer is devoted to the Women’s Institutes, “but these activities were hampered by Sir Osmond, who disapproved of what he considered the Bolshevist tendencies of the movement.” Consequently, Jennifer has learned to keep “her real opinions and interests to herself.” Jennifer’s fiancé, Cheriton, says Sir Osmond “had a genius for awkwardness, I would back him to arouse envy, hatred, and uncharitableness in any perfectly harmonious party of people in less than twenty-four hours” :

He always seemed to thrive on the atmosphere of distrust and discomfort which he had such a knack of creating and although the Melbury family was riddled with feuds and jealousies, these were always conducted in a polite manner, with sarcasm and innuendo but never a healthy row.

The chapters told from the viewpoints of various guests are a nice twist and author Mavis Doriel Hay manages to convey a different tone to each of these chapters as they pave the way to the crime. Philip Cheriton’s chatty account gives a nice history of the family and various relationships, and this is in wonderful contrast to Aunt Mildred’s fussy, critical narrative. We see that stubbornness runs in the Melbury blood, for Aunt Mildred, who helped steer most of the Melbury children towards ‘suitable’ marriages, now sees the consequences of her work but refuses to admit that perhaps she was wrong.

There’s a clue thrown out very early in the book which signals the solution, and while The Santa Klaus Murder has nothing new to offer to the genre, it is an enjoyable, seasonal read.

The book comes complete with a plan of the ground floor of Flaxmere House and a cast of characters.

Review copy. This is another British Library Crime Classic from Poisoned Pen Press.

The Santa Klaus Murder was also reviewed by Ali of Heavenali

Advertisements

19 Comments

Filed under Fiction, Hay Mavis Doriel

19 responses to “The Santa Klaus Murder: Mavis Doriel Hay (1936)

  1. I enjoyed reading your review. I quite enjoyed reading it and thought the use of different narrators interesting. Have you read any of the other Hay reprints by the British Library?

  2. This sounds good fun. I am absolutely hopeless at picking up on the clues however. They have to be almost signalled with flashing lights before I get them

  3. Oh dear, my heart always sinks when I see a map. It seems to demand far more brain power than I have free to devote to thinking it through. I have a theory that people who enjoy doing that are the same people who like playing Bridge -i.e no flibbertigibbets need apply.

  4. I wasn’t sure about this when I read Ali’s review, but it sounds a little better here. In fact, it might make a good stocking filler for a reading friend of mine. I just love the covers of these BL Crime Classics editions – they’re beautifully produced.

  5. These seems like a great book to read this time of year.

    Though I think that I would like it to. I will be recommending this one to my wife as I think that she would really like this.

  6. Tom Cunliffe

    I’ve seen this series and wondered what they were like and how they hold up in the modern world. The name Melbury reminds me of Lord Melbury in Fawlty Towers “A Touch of Class” – the first episode in the whole series – I wonder if the writers picked the name up from this book? (doubtful I suppose).

  7. This sounds like a lot of fun. I finally got my first British Library Crime Classic today.

  8. I wish people would stop leaving such intriguing reviews of the British Library Crime Classic’s as I want the whole collection – this sounds like an enjoyable seasonal tale, I do like a good closed house mystery!

  9. This British Library Crime Classic collection seems great.

    Each time I feel a bit frustrated because these books are not available in French or if they are, the translation dates back to times when crime fiction books were poorly translated

  10. sounds like a good old classic. thanks!
    Also, I was trying to contact you to remind you to do your recap for the French Bingo, but I could not find any email or twitter or facebook account. Also tomorrow on http://wordsandpeace.com you will see a poll to vote for how you want the French Bingo to be in 2016!

  11. As with so many of these, it sounds a lot of fun. I’m another who’s hopeless at picking up clues. I think it’s because I don’t really care about personally working out whodunnit, the puzzle aspect doesn’t interest me.

    Maps? Did I miss a reference to maps?

    • It’s a floorplan of the house.

      • The plan of the ground floor, of course! I tend to associate maps with fantasy fiction – the kingdom of Ebherred borders with the wastes of Ptang K’noth and the Hrabal woods. That sort of thing.

        A plan is definitely old school. So I can actually map characters’ accounts to the plan and work out if they stack up, interesting. Not that I would. Too much like work.

  12. I didn’t use the floorplan to solve the crime either.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s