“Marriage is such a sordid, morbid relationship.”
Elizabeth Taylor’s dark novel A Wreath of Roses explores the relationships between three women–relationships which cause them to question the choices they have made. Each of these women: Frances, Liza and Camilla, have chosen different paths in life with varied success. Frances, at one time, was Liz’s governess, but since retirement, she’s concentrated on painting. Liz married a vicar while her childhood friend Camilla, a school secretary, damaged from a long-ago relationship slides into spinsterhood. Camilla travels, as she does every year, to the country home of Frances, where she will spend the summer with Liz, but this year is different. Frances is ill. Liz now has a baby, and for the first time, Camilla is shut out from experiences she has not had, cannot understand, and professes to reject.
A Wreath of Roses opens ominously. Camilla has reached a point in her life where she realises that life has passed her by. Being in Liz’s company serves to reinforce Camilla’s unhappiness: yet her observations about Liz are not black and white, not simple. On one hand, she can’t understand why Liz chose to marry a self-absorbed vicar, and the demanding presence of Liz’s baby has served to place a distance between the two childhood friends. Camilla is independent and can please herself while Liz frets about her baby’s health and her husband’s wandering attention.
Frances, who is ill, contemplates death, the meaningless of life and now paints from “an inner darkness.” She has maintained a long-time correspondence with Mr Beddoes, a rather lonely bachelor whose “spiritual” relationship with Frances is about to change when he travels to meet her for the first time. As a film director and an ardent observer of human nature, he’s the first person to recognise that Camilla is heading into danger through her relationship with Richard Elton, an enigmatic man, a charmer, also on holiday. Richard claims to be writing a book about his war experiences. ….
Camilla, who wants to return to her boring employment with memories to help fill her sterile life, finds herself attracted to Richard in spite of several warning signs and in spite of the fact that he’s not her ‘type’ at all. He has the “conventional good-looks of the kind that she, Camilla, believed she despised,” and Richard, for his part, dismisses Camilla as a “schoolmistress.” A terrible event brings them into each other’s orbit, and once there, Richard and Camilla sense a need that can be fulfilled. But they need different things:
“And women. Love.” he went on impatiently. “Where does it lead to, I wondered.”
“Must it lead somewhere?” She smiled.
“For a few days it didn’t need to. Then it would all seem like a play I was acting in. Been acting in a long time. A long run, and I knew all my lines too well and was stale and boring everyone. But most of all myself. Then I tried death.”
“In the war,” he said lightly. “I went up very close to it. My own and other people’s. And there it was. Unlike all the other things, it never changed. It was always real. I seem to carry the thought of it about with me.”
“Oh … I shan’t … it’s just that people are like doors. They lead you into empty rooms. You pass through and are left with yourself. Only death goes through ahead of you.”
Richard and Camilla’s relationship is the darkest undercurrent in this novel, and the novel’s tone is lightened by the gossip borne by Mrs Parsons, the cleaning lady, and by Liz fretting about her relationship with her husband. Liz acknowledges that her husband being a clergyman added to his initial attraction, and hinted at “inner mystery.” Liz is beginning to wonder if she made a mistake:
“I did think, though,” she continued, at once disregarding her own instructions, “that a clergyman would have something more in him than was obvious at first glance. But I discovered there was even less.”
Liz finds she is irritated by her husband’s almost continual presence at home and that she “is left with a rather cold and greedy man sitting at his desk writing notes to other women–casual-seeming little notes which take him hours and hours to scribble off.” This summer is a period of adjustment for Liz: she must adjust to married life, motherhood, and her responsibilities (and sacrifices) as a vicar’s wife.
A Wreath of Roses examines the lives of three women who all wonder if they made the right choices. There’s Frances who “assumed” the act of being an old maid while her dark view of life and unexpressed passion erupt in her art. Acknowledging that she threw herself into raising Liz, Frances admits that she also “evaded the pain and the delight of human-relationships.” Frances sees Camilla making the same choices that she did and even at one point says that “even Liz’s marriage is better than no marriage at all.”
“We go on for years at a jog-trot,” Frances said, “and then suddenly we are beset by doubts, the landscape darkens, we feel lost and alone, all at once that we must grope our way forward for we cannot retrace our footsteps.”
While Richard and Camilla’s relationship is the novel’s darkest point, another dark undercurrent flows from Frances’s nihilistic view of life.
“Life’s not simplicity,” she said slowly. “Not loving-kindness either. It’s darkness, and the terrible things we do to one another, and to ourselves. The sooner we are out of it the better. And paintings don’t matter. They are like making daisy-chains in the shadow of a volcano. Pathetic and childish.”
She sat down on a kitchen-chair and looked at the lamp burning; her clenched hand beat nervously against her thigh.
“The only thing that makes sense of it all is looking up at the sky at night and knowing that even the burden of cruelty we’ve laid upon the earth, scarcely exists; must fly away into dust, is nothing, too infinitesimal to matter. All the time, the house is falling into ruin, and I run to the walls and tack my pretty pictures to them as they collapse.”
Caroline’s Review is here.
12 responses to “A Wreath of Roses: Elizabeth Taylor (1949)”
At Mrs LIppincote’s was always my favourite Elizabeth Taylor novel but this, which i haven’t read, sounds quite wonderful. Will get hold of forthwith. I love the way she is so dark under the humour.
I have yet to read that one, so something to look forward to.
It‘s quite dark, isn’t it?
I was very surprised by it but In a good way.
When did you read it?
Beginning of 2017. I even reviewed it. I just noticed I didn’t read any of her novels this year. 2018 was an odd reading and blogging year for me.
I have still to read Elizabeth Taylor. I remember when I first came across her in the Virago imprint and deciding I must read her, but I haven’t yet. I like the sound of this story-line – right up my alley. I’m wondering though how old they are for the main part of the novel. My first assumption was that these were older women, but if one has just had a child they clearly aren’t THAT old.
This was published in 1949. Camilla and Liz are young still as we would call them these days, but Camilla doesn’t have a social life, and when the book opens it’s unlikely that, in her limited circles, she would ever meet someone. She grasps that, tells herself she doesn’t want Liz’s life, but also identifies with Frances.
I tossed my notes so I’m not sure if ages were mentioned but I’d say that Frances is near 70. If someone else has read it and knows differently, please add a comment
You’ve tossed your notes! I’ve still got some from over ten years ago, but have over recent years been gradually parting with them! I’m completely ridiculous! I’m not one of those hoarders whose house becomes unusable, unhygienic, because they can’t get rid of anything, but a corner of my brain understands them.
I’ve been throwing out left and right lately.
Haha Guy … sounds like you are reaching that time in life when thoughts turn to decluttering and down-sizing? I’m doing it in fits and starts too. But it sounds like you are being more efficient about it.
It’s bizzare what you find when you go looking. I’ve found things I didn’t know I had.
Haha, and then you say, well if I didn’t know I had it do I need it? I’m thinking about all those things I keep IN CASE they come in handy but know in my heart that if the time came I’d either forget I had them or not remember the logical place I stored them. These things MUST go!